Showing posts with label hub. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hub. Show all posts

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Newspaper Wars Over the Manifesto

Lately I've been finishing up the reading of B. Carmon Hardy's excellent book Solemn Covenant: The Mormon Polygamous Passage.  While reflecting on some of the newspaper sources he used with reference to the 1890 Woodruff Manifesto, I started looking through them and found them (and a few others not there cited) quite interesting.  With that in mind, I'm setting in motion a brief but dense series here in which I hope to provide noteworthy articles from the Deseret News, the Salt Lake Tribune, and the Salt Lake Herald from late September and October 1890.  While the main subject for many is polygamy or the status of the Manifesto itself, the exchange of heated editorials back and forth provide insight into a variety of other secondary issues involved as well.  This post will serve as a hub to be updated with each new installment; I hope to release each on the corresponding date in late April and May, so as to provide the sensation of attempting to keep up with the war of words as it happened.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling - Review Hub

The first book we'll be covering in our book review series is Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling: A Cultural Biography of Mormonism's Founder (2005), written by Richard Lyman Bushman with assistance from Jed Woodworth. Richard Bushman (b. 1931) is an emeritus professor of history at Columbia University and is himself an active Latter-day Saint who lives in New York City. The book itself is, as one might guess, a biography of Joseph Smith, Jr. (1805-1844), the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement. It is published by Alfred A. Knopf (a division of Random House) and won the 2005 Best Book Award from the Mormon History Association, as well as the 2005 Evans Biography Award from University of Utah's Mountain West Center for Regional Studies. Further relevant links:

And now, for the links to our review/summary posts themselves:

  1. The Church of Christ: 1830
  2. Joseph, Moses, and Enoch: 1830
  3. The Kirtland Visionaries: January-June 1831
  4. Zion: July-December 1831
  5. The Burden of Zion: 1832
  6. Exaltation: 1832-33
  7. Cities of Zion: 1833
  8. The Character of a Prophet: 1834
  9. Priesthood and Church Government: 1834-35
  10. Visitors: 1835
  11. Texts: 1835
  12. Strife: August-December 1835
  13. The Order of Heaven: January-April 1836
  14. Reverses: April 1836-January 1838
  15. Trials: January-July 1838
  16. War: August-December 1838
  17. Imprisonment: January-August 1839
  18. Washington: September 1839-June 1840
  19. Beautiful Place: April 1840-April 1841
  20. Temporalities and Spiritualities: 1841
  21. Stories of Eternity: Spring 1842
  22. Perils: May-December 1842
  23. Thickets: 1843
  24. City and Kingdom: 1843-1844
  25. Confrontations: January-June 1844
  26. Epilogue

Not being as familiar as I'd like yet with the full and detailed story of Joseph Smith, I suspect I'll mostly be absorbing the narrative in this book, so please bear with me; this 'review' will be very heavy on the summary and relatively light on evaluation, in order that it can also serve as an introduction to the life of Joseph Smith for myself and my non-LDS readers. Thanks for reading!

Also, I highly encourage you to look at a much briefer (but better) review by Tim over at LDS & Evangelical Conversations.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Book Review Hub

Sometime soon, I intend to begin a number of series of book reviews here on this blog. All books will be chosen because I see some reason why they would be relevant to Latter-day Saints or to those who are involved in LDS-Evangelical dialogue. Each of the reviews will be done basically chapter-by-chapter, and each book will get its own hub page, to which I'll link here. In many cases, especially where I either don't feel as though I have the expertise to make an evaluation or else I'm simply not in the mood to show my hand, the reviews will basically be summaries of what the books are saying. The main purpose, by and large, will be to introduce readers to the contents of the books. It'll be a little while before we get started, so in the meantime, here's a list of some of the books we'll be examining (order subject to revision):

  • Richard L. Bushman's Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling (2005)
  • Terryl L. Givens' By the Hand of Mormon: The American Scripture That Launched a New World Religion (2003)
  • Todd Compton's In Sacred Loneliness: The Plural Wives of Joseph Smith (1997)
  • Michael F. Hull's Baptism on Account of the Dead (1 Cor. 15:29): An Act of Faith in the Resurrection (2005)
  • Robert S. Wicks and Fred R. Foister, Junius and Joseph: Presidential Politics and the Assassination of the First Mormon Prophet (2005)
  • Leonard J. Arrington's Brigham Young: American Moses (1986)
  • Newell G. Bringhurst and Craig L. Foster, The Mormon Quest for the Presidency (2008)
  • R. W. L. Moberly's Prophecy and Discernment (2008)
  • Terryl L. Givens' People of Paradox: A History of Mormon Culture (2007)
  • Sarah Barringer Gordon's The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America (2001)
  • Craig L. Blomberg and Stephen E. Robinson, How Wide the Divide? A Mormon and an Evangelical in Conversation (1997)
  • John L. Brooke's The Refiner's Fire: The Making of Mormon Cosmology, 1644-1844 (1996)
  • Leonard J. Arrington's The Mormon Experience: A History of the Latter-Day Saints (1992)
  • Andre Munzinger's Discerning the Spirits: Theological and Ethical Hermeneutics in Paul (2007)
  • Kurt Widmer's Mormonism and the Nature of God: A Theological Evolution, 1830-1915 (2000)
  • D. Michael Quinn's Early Mormonism and the Magic World View (1998)
  • Klaus J. Hansen's Quest for Empire: The Political Kingdom of God and the Council of Fifty in Mormon History (1974)
  • Terryl L. Givens' The Viper on the Hearth: Mormons, Myths, and the Construction of Heresy (1997)
  • D. Michael Quinn's The Mormon Hierarchy: Origins of Power (1994)
  • Philip L. Barlow's Mormons and the Bible: The Place of the Latter-Day Saints in American Religion (1991)
  • D. Michael Quinn's The Mormon Hierarchy: Extensions of Power (1997)
  • Douglas J. Davies' The Mormon Culture of Salvation: Force, Grace, and Glory (2000)
  • James Patrick Holding's The Mormon Defenders: How Latter-day Saint Apologists Misinterpret the Bible (2001)
  • Erich Robert Paul's Science, Religion, and Mormon Cosmology (1992)
  • David John Buerger's The Mysteries of Godliness: A History of Mormon Temple Worship (2002)
  • Donna Hill's Joseph Smith: The First Mormon (1999)
  • Robert L. Millet and Gerald R. McDermott, Claiming Christ: A Mormon-Evangelical Debate (2007)
  • David Persuitte's Joseph Smith and the Origins of the Book of Mormon (2000)
  • Kathryn M. Daynes' More Wives Than One: Transformation of the Mormon Marriage System, 1840-1910 (2001)
  • Dan Vogel's Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet (2004)
  • Francis J. Beckwith, Carl Mosser, and Paul Owen, eds., The New Mormon Challenge: Responding to the Latest Defenses of a Fast-Growing Movement (2002)

Please stay tuned!

Saturday, December 4, 2010

EvDoc Study Series: Intro and Hub

Apparently I have a short attention span, because I'm ready to inaugurate yet a third major series of posts here. In one series, as you know, we're working our way - slowly but surely - through the Journal of Discourses, which is a large collection of early LDS discourses. But this blog isn't focusing exclusively on LDS issues; it's also meant to explore Evangelical issues. And hopefully not just Evangelical readers but also Latter-day Saint readers will be able to gain a better perspective on what Evangelicals are saying within their own camps. So this new series is going to be exploring major documents promulgated fairly recently within (or in connection with) Evangelicalism - and, perhaps eventually, some older documents that are still held to be important by many Evangelicals. We'll be starting out with the Lausanne Covenant. Because of the length of the documents, I'll be looking at them piece-by-piece, mostly just posting each section and opening it up for comments. As a bonus, these numerous short posts will hopefully provide some relief from the extra-long posts that have so far been dominating the blog.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

JOD Series: Introduction and Hub

I'd like to announce the start of my second major series of posts here at Study and Faith; this post will serve as a hub. Beginning in December 2010, I will be working my way through the Journal of Discourses, a 26-volume set of early LDS sermons and addresses (which is also available here and here), and post questions and relatively brief reflections. And I'd prefer not to do it alone. That's why I'd like to invite anyone who wishes - be you LDS, Evangelical, or otherwise - to join in and read through the Journal of Discourses with me. Once I make a post on a given discourse, feel free to chime in!

[N.B. - The links to my posts are on the initial number references, while links to each volume of the Journal of Discourses are available on those headings, and links to individual sermons/addresses are on the titles given. More links will be provided as time goes on.]

Appreciation Series: Introduction and Hub

All too often, Evangelicals have a tendency to place greatest stress on what's wrong (or, what we see as wrong) with other religious traditions. There are some understandable reasons for that. After all, seldom do the Church Fathers praise the early unorthodox schismatics for their belief in, say, the uniqueness of Christ. The focus, rather, is on warning the flock why they shouldn't throw their chips in with the novel upstarts and instead should hold fast to the faith that's been handed down from the apostles; or, on presenting a direct challenge - often in a polemical sort of discourse - to the 'false teachers' on precisely those points where they diverge from what the orthodox tradition understands to be the truth. Such is perfectly natural, and inevitably leads one to focus on the 'negatives'. Nor is this a purely post-apostolic phenomenon. In James 2:19, the Lord's brother does not seem to consider the demons worthy of praise simply because they rightly believe that there is a God; the focus is not on what the demons have right, but on what they have wrong, and thereby to apply this to the situation of professing Christians who have a similar lack - in this case, a lack of a living faith that flowers into a righteous and Christ-like life. I'm sure that, with more thought, I could cite a number of other examples of this tendency to focus on the 'negatives' when those seem to be more pertinent than the positives; arguably, the same tendency exists in early LDS discussions of the rest of the Christian world. So with that background in mind, maybe it's easier to understand why that tendency should exist among Evangelicals as well.

Still, there are considerable downsides to letting that approach dominate our interactions. There is some good in virtually every tradition, often much good, and that can't be ignored; it may, rather, serve as a fruitful foundation for productive discussions and mutual respect and love. All too often, the sharp polemical edge and negative focus of discussions has resulted in a hostility-charged atmosphere that doesn't need to be there; and, worse yet, it has frequently prompted participants on all sides - myself at times regrettably included - to display a not-so-Christ-like mindset and heart. And these are only several of the problems with a dominant negative approach.

So, without compromising the distinctive truths that I believe the orthodox and Evangelical Christian tradition has to offer Latter-day Saints, I'd like to inaugurate the first major series of posts at this blog with a few reflections on what I, as an Evangelical Christian, honestly can positively appreciate about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints - including its teachings (doctrinal and moral), its practices, and its culture and life.